Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew
Homily 1
Chrysostom begins by reflecting on the gift of Scripture itself: why the written word became necessary, how the evangelists differ without contradicting one another, and why Matthew begins where he does. The homily then leads us toward the opening words of the Gospel.
1 It would indeed be fitting for us not at all to require the aid of the written Word, but rather to exhibit a life so pure, that the grace of the Spirit should serve instead of books to our souls, and that as these are inscribed with ink, even so should our hearts be with the Spirit. But, since we have utterly put away this grace from us, come, let us at any rate embrace the second best course.
For that the former was better, God has made manifest, both by His words, and by His deeds. Since to Noah, and to Abraham, and to his offspring, and to Job, and to Moses too, He discoursed not by writings, but Himself by Himself, finding their mind pure. But after the whole people of the Hebrews had fallen into the very pit of wickedness, then and thereafter was a written word, and tables, and the admonition which is given by these.
And this one may perceive was the case, not of the saints in the Old Testament only, but also of those in the New. For neither to the apostles did God give anything in writing, but instead of written words He promised that He would give them the grace of the Spirit: for “He,” says our Lord, “shall bring all things to your remembrance.”1
And that you may learn that this was far better, hear what He says by the Prophet: “I will make a new covenant with you, putting my laws into their mind, and in their heart I will write them,” and, “they shall be all taught of God.”2 And Paul too, pointing out the same superiority, said, that they had received a law “not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.”3 But since in process of time they made shipwreck, some with regard to doctrines, others as to life and manners, there was again need that they should be put in remembrance by the written word.
2 Reflect then how great an evil it is for us, who ought to live so purely as not even to need written words, but to yield up our hearts, as books, to the Spirit; now that we have lost that honour, and come to need these, to fail again in duly employing even this second remedy. For if it is a blame to stand in need of written words, and not to have brought down on ourselves the grace of the Spirit; consider how heavy the charge of not choosing to profit even after this assistance, but rather treating what is written with neglect, as if it were cast forth without purpose, and at random, and so bringing down upon ourselves our punishment with increase.
But that no such effect may ensue, let us give strict heed to the things that are written; and let us learn how the Old Law was given on the one hand, how on the other the New Covenant.
3 How then was that law given in time past, and when, and where? After the destruction of the Egyptians, in the wilderness, on Mount Sinai, when smoke and fire were rising up out of the mountain, a trumpet sounding, thunders and lightnings, and Moses entering into the very depth of the cloud. But in the new covenant not so, neither in a wilderness, nor in a mountain, nor with smoke and darkness and cloud and tempest; but at the beginning of the day, in a house, while all were sitting together, with great quietness, all took place.
For to those, being more unreasonable, and hard to guide, there was need of outward pomp, as of a wilderness, a mountain, a smoke, a sound of trumpet, and the other like things: but they who were of a higher character, and submissive, and who had risen above merely bodily conceptions,4 require none of these.5
And if even in their case there was a sound, it was not for the sake of the apostles, but for the Jews, who were present, on whose account also the tongues of fire appeared. For if, even after this, some said, “they are filled with new wine,“6 much more would they have said so, had they seen none of these things. And in the Old Testament, it was upon Moses’ going up, that God came down; but here, when our nature has been carried up into Heaven, or rather unto the royal throne, then the Spirit makes His descent.
Now had the Spirit been an inferior being7, the results would not have been greater and more wonderful. For indeed these tables are far better, and the achievements more illustrious. Since the apostles came not down from a mountain, as Moses, bearing monuments of stone in their hands, but carrying about the Spirit in their mind, and pouring forth a kind of treasure and fountain of doctrines and of gifts and of all things that are good, so they went everywhere around and became, though that grace, living books and laws. Thus they won over “the tree thousand,” thus “the five thousand,“8 thus the nations of the world; God, by their tongue, discoursing with all that approached them.
4 By whom Matthew also, being filled with the Spirit, wrote, what he did write: Matthew the Publican, for I am not ashamed to name him by his trade, neither him nor the others. For this is a very special way indicated both the grace of the Spirit, and their virtue. And He hath properly called His work by a name (which signifies) good tidings.
Indeed, it was removal of punishment, and remission of sins, and “righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption,”9 and adoption, and an inheritance of Heaven, and a relationship to the Son of God, which he came declaring to all; to enemies, to the perverse, to them that were sitting in darkness.
What then could ever be equal to these good tidings? God on earth, man in Heaven; and all became mingled together, angels joined the choirs of men, men had fellowship with the angels, and with the other powers above: and one might see the long war brought to an end, and reconciliation made between God and our nature, the devil brought to shame, demons in flight, death destroyed, Paradise opened, the curse blotted out, sin put out of the way, error driven off, truth returning, the word of godliness everywhere sown, and flourishing in its growth, the polity of those above planted on the earth, those powers in secure intercourse with us, and on earth angels continually haunting, and hope abundant touching things to come.
Therefore he has called the history good tidings, because as all other things surely are words only without substance; as, for instance, plenty of wealth, greatness of power, kingdoms, and glories, and honours, and whatever other things among men are accounted to be good: but those which are published by the fishermen would be legitimately and properly called good tidings: not only as being sure and immoveable blessings, and beyond our deserts, but also as being given to us with all facility. For not by labouring and sweating, not by fatigue and suffering, but merely as being beloved of God, we received what we have received.
5 And why could it have been that, when there were so many disciples, only two wrote from among the apostles, and two from among their followers? (For one who was a disciple of Paul, and another of Peter, together with Matthew and John, wrote the Gospels.) It was because they did nothing for vainglory, but all things for use. “What then? Was not one evangelist sufficient to tell all?” One indeed was sufficient; but if there are four who write, not at the same time, nor in the same places, neither after having met together and conversed with one another, and then they speak all things as it were out of one mouth, this becomes a very great demonstration of the truth.
6 “But the contrary,” it may be said, “has come to pass, for in many places they are convicted of discordance.” On the contrary, this very thing is strong evidence of their truth. For if they had agreed in all things exactly even to time, and place, and to the very words, none of our enemies would have believed that they had met together, and had written what they wrote by some human compact; because such entire agreement as this comes not of simplicity. But now even that discordance which seems to exist in little matters delivers them from all suspicion, and speaks clearly in behalf of the character of the writers.
But if there is anything concerning times or places that they have related differently, this does not harm the truth of what they have said. And these things too, so far as God enables us, we will endeavour to point out as we proceed, asking you, in addition to what we have already mentioned, to observe that on the chief points—those which shape our life and form our doctrine—none of them is found to have disagreed in the slightest.
But what are these points? They are as follows: that God became man, that He performed miracles, that He was crucified, that He was buried, that He rose again, that He ascended, that He will judge, that He has given commandments leading to salvation, that He has introduced a law not contrary to the Old Testament, that He is the Son, that He is the Only-Begotten, that He is the true Son, that He is of the same substance as the Father, and other things like these; for on these points, we shall find that they are in full agreement. And if, among the miracles, they have not all mentioned every one, but one mentions some and another others, let this not trouble you. For if one had related them all, the others would have been superfluous; and if, on the other hand, they had all written entirely different things, their agreement would not have been evident.
For this reason they have both treated of many things in common, and each of them has also received and declared something of his own; that, on the one hand, he might not seem superfluous, and cast on the heap to no purpose; on the other, he might make our test of the truth of their affirmations perfect.
7 Now Luke also tells us the reason why he proceeds to write: “that you may hold,” he says, “the certainty of the words in which you have been instructed;“10 that is, that being continually reminded you may hold fast to the certainty and abide in it. But as for John, he has himself kept silent regarding the reason; yet, (as tradition says11, which has come down to us from the beginning, even from the Fathers,) neither did he come to write without purpose; but since it had been the care of the three to dwell upon the account of the dispensation, and the doctrines of the Godhead were in danger of being left unspoken, he, moved by Christ, then and not till then set himself to compose his Gospel. And this is manifest both from the history itself, and from the opening of his Gospel.
For he does not begin like the others from below, but from above, from the same point at which he was aiming, and it was with this view that he composed the whole book. And not at the beginning only, but throughout all the Gospel, he is more lofty than the rest. Of Matthew again it is said11, that when those who from among the Jews had believed came to him, and besought him to leave to them in writing those same things, which he had spoken to them by word, he also composed his Gospel in the language of the Hebrews. And Mark too, in Egypt12, is said to have done this self-same thing at the entreaty of the disciples.
For this reason then Matthew, as writing to Hebrews, sought to show nothing more, than that He was from Abraham and David; but Luke, as discoursing to all in general, traces up the account higher, going on even to Adam. And the one begins with His generation, because nothing was so soothing to the Jew as to be told that Christ was the offspring of Abraham and David: the other does not do so, but mentions many other things, and then proceeds to the genealogy.
8 But we will establish the harmony between them both by the whole world, which has received their statements, and by the very enemies of the truth. For many sects have arisen since their time, holding opinions opposed to their words; some of these have received all that they have said, while others have cut off from the rest certain portions of their statements and so retain them for themselves.13
But if there were any hostility in their statements, neither would the sects, who maintain the contrary part, have received all, but only so much as seemed to harmonize with themselves; nor would those, which have parted off a portion, be utterly refuted by that portion; so that the very fragments cannot be hidden, but declare aloud their connection with the whole body. And just as if you should take any part from the side of an animal, even in that part you would find all the things out of which the whole is composed—nerves and veins, bones, arteries, and blood, and a sample, as one might say, of the whole lump;—so likewise with regard to the Scriptures; in each portion of what is there stated, one may see the connection with the whole clearly appearing.
Whereas, if they were in disagreement, this could not have been pointed out, and the doctrine itself would long since have been brought to nothing: “for every kingdom,” He says, “divided against itself shall not stand.”14 But now even in this shines forth the might of the Spirit, namely, in that it prevailed on these men, engaged as they were in those things which are more necessary and very urgent, to suffer no harm at all from these little matters. Now, where each one was living when he wrote, it is not right for us to state with certainty. But that they are not opposed to each other, this we will endeavour to prove, throughout the whole work. And you, in accusing them of disagreement, are doing just the same as if you were to insist upon their using the same words and forms of speech.
9 And I do not yet say, that those likewise who glory greatly in rhetoric and philosophy, having many of them written many books about the same matters, have not merely expressed themselves differently, but have even spoken in opposition to one another (for it is one thing to speak differently and another to speak at variance); none of these things do I say.
Far be it from me to frame our defence from the frenzy of those men, neither am I willing out of falsehood to make recommendations for the truth. But this I would be glad to inquire: how were the differing accounts believed? how did they prevail? how was it that, while saying opposite things, they were admired, were believed, were celebrated everywhere in the world? And yet the witnesses of what they said were many, and many too were their adversaries and enemies.
For they did not write these things in one corner and bury them, but everywhere, by sea and by land, they unfolded them in the ears of all, and these things were read in the presence of enemies, even as they are now, and none of the things which they said offended any one. And very naturally, for it was a divine power that pervaded all, and made it to prosper among all men.
10 For if this were not so, how could the publican, the fisherman, and the unlearned attain such philosophy? For things which those outside have never been able to imagine, not even in a dream, are by these men with great certainty both published and made convincing, not only during their lives but even after their death: neither to two men, nor twenty men, nor a hundred, nor a thousand, nor ten thousand, but to cities, nations, and peoples, both on land and sea, in the lands of Greeks and barbarians, both inhabited and desert; and all concerning things far beyond our nature.
For leaving the earth, their discourse is entirely about the things in heaven, while they bring us another principle of life, another manner of living: both wealth and poverty, freedom and slavery, life and death, our world and our polity, all changed. Not like Plato, who composed that ridiculous Republic, or Zeno, or if there be any one else who has written a polity, or framed laws. For indeed, regarding all these things, it has been made manifest by themselves that an evil spirit, and some cruel demon at war with our race, a foe to modesty, and an enemy to good order, overturning all things, has made his voice be heard in their souls.
When, for example, they make their women common to all, and strip virgins naked in the palaestra15, bringing them into the gaze of men; and when they establish secret marriages, mingling all things together and confounding them, and overturning the limits of nature, what else is there to say? For that these their sayings are all inventions of devils, and contrary to nature, even nature herself would testify, not tolerating what we have mentioned; and this, though they write not amidst persecutions, nor dangers, nor fightings, but in all security and freedom, and deck it out with many ornaments from many sources.
But these doctrines of the fishermen, chased as they were, scourged and in jeopardy, both learned and unlearned, both bond and free, both kings and private soldiers, both barbarians and Greeks, have received with all good will.
11 And you cannot say that these things were easily received by all men because they were trifling and low; on the contrary, these doctrines are far higher than those. As for virginity, they never imagined even its name so much as in a dream, nor yet of voluntary poverty, nor of fasting, nor of any other of those things that are high.
But we, who are of our part, not only exterminate lust, but chastise not only the act, but even an unchaste look, and insulting language, and disorderly laughter, and dress, and gait, and clamor; and we carry on our exactness even to the smallest things, and have filled the whole earth with the plant of virginity. And concerning God too, and the things in heaven, we persuade men to be wise with such knowledge as no one of those has at any time been able so much as to conceive in his mind.
For how could they, who made images of beasts, and of monsters that crawl on the earth, and of other things still more vile? Yet these high doctrines were both accepted and believed, and they flourish every day and increase; but the others have passed away, and perished, having disappeared more easily than spiders’ webs. And very naturally, for they were demons that published these things; therefore besides their uncleanness, their obscurity is great, and the labour they require greater.
For what could be more ridiculous than that “republic,” in which, besides what I have mentioned, the philosopher, when he has spent lines without number, that he may be able to show what justice is, has over and above this prolixity filled his discourse with much indistinctness? This, even if it did contain anything profitable, must needs be very useless for the life of man.
For if the farmer and the smith, the builder and the pilot, and every one who subsists by the labour of his hands, is to leave his trade, and his honest toils, and is to spend such and such a number of years in order to learn what justice is; before he has learnt he will often times be absolutely destroyed by hunger, and perish because of this justice, not having learnt anything else useful to be known, and having ended his life by a cruel death.
12 But our lessons are not such; rather Christ has taught us what is just, what is seemly, and what is expedient, and all virtue in general, comprising it in few and plain words: at one time saying that, “on two commandments hang the Law and the Prophets;“16 that is to say, on the love of God and on the love of our neighbour; at another time, “So whatever you wish that men would do to you, do so to them; for this is the law and the prophets.”17 And these things even to a labourer, and to a servant, and to a widow woman, and to a very child, and to him that appears to be exceedingly slow of understanding, are all plain to comprehend and easy to learn.
For the lessons of the truth are like this; and the actual result bears witness to this. All at least have learned what they are to do, and not only learned, but also, been eager to emulate them; and not in the cities alone nor in the midst of the marketplaces, but also on the summits of the mountains.
Indeed, for there you will see true wisdom18 abounding, and choirs of angels shining forth in a human body, and the commonwealth19 of Heaven manifested here on earth. For a commonwealth19 did these fishermen too write for us, not with commands that it should be embraced from childhood, like those others, nor making it a law that the virtuous man must be so many years old, but addressing their discourse generally to every age.
For those lessons are children’s toys, but these are the truth of things. And as a place for this their commonwealth19 they have assigned Heaven, and God they have brought in as its framer, and as lawgiver of the statutes there set; as indeed was their duty. And the rewards in their commonwealth19 are not leaves of bay nor olive, nor an allowance of meat in the public hall, nor statues of brass, these cold and ordinary things, but a life which has no end, and to become children of God, to join the angels’ choir, and to stand by the royal throne, and to be always with Christ. And the popular guides of this commonwealth19 are publicans, and fishermen, and tent-makers, not such as have lived for a short time, but such as are now living for ever.
Therefore, even after their death they may possibly do the greatest good to those governed. This republic19 is at war not with men, but with devils and those incorporeal powers. Therefore also their captain is is neither man nor angel, but God Himself. And the armour too of these warriors suits the nature of the warfare, for it is not formed of hides and steel, but of truth and righteousness, and faith, and all true love of wisdom.18
13 Since then the aforementioned republic19 is both the subject on which this book was written, and it is now proposed for us to speak of it, let us give careful heed to Matthew, discoursing plainly concerning this: for what he says is not his own, but all Christ’s, who has made the laws of this city.19
Let us give heed, I say, that we may be capable of enrolment in it, and of shining forth among those who have already become its citizens, and are awaiting those incorruptible crowns. To many, however, this discourse seems to be easy, while the prophetic writings are difficult.
But this again is the view of men who do not know the depth of the thoughts laid up in it. Therefore I entreat you to follow us with much diligence, so as to enter into the very ocean of the things written, with Christ for our guide as we enter in.
But in order that the word may be easier to learn, we pray and entreat you, as we have done also with respect to the other Scriptures, to read beforehand that portion of Scripture which we are going to explain, so that your reading may prepare the way for your understanding (as was also the case with the eunuch)20, and so may greatly facilitate our task.
14 And this is because the questions are many and frequent. See, for instance, at once in the beginning of his Gospel, how many difficulties might be raised one after the other. As first, why the genealogy of Joseph is traced, who was not the father of Christ. Secondly, by what means it may be made manifest that He derives His origin from David, while the forefathers of Mary, who bore Him, are not known, for the Virgin’s genealogy is not traced? Thirdly, on what account Joseph’s genealogy is traced, when he had nothing to do with the birth; while with regard to the Virgin, who was the very mother, it is not shown of what fathers, or grandfathers, or ancestors, she is sprung.
And along with these things, this is also worth inquiry, how it can be that, when tracing the genealogy through the men, he has mentioned women also; and why, since he determined upon doing this, he yet did not mention them all, but passing over the more eminent, such as Sarah, Rebecca, and as many as are like them, he has brought forward only those famed for some bad thing; as, for instance, if any was a harlot, or an adulteress, or a mother by an unlawful marriage, if any was a stranger or barbarian.
For he has made mention of the wife of Uriah, and of Tamar, and of Rahab, and of Ruth, of whom one was of a strange race, another a harlot, another was defiled by her near kinsman, and with him not in the form of marriage, but by a stolen intercourse, when she had put on herself the mask of a harlot; and touching the wife of Uriah no one is ignorant, by reason of the notoriety of the crime.
And yet the evangelist has passed by all the rest, and inserted in the genealogy these alone. Whereas, if women were to be mentioned, all ought to be so; if not all but some, then those famed in the way of virtue, not for evil deeds. See you how much care is required of us straightway in the first beginning? and yet the beginning seems to be plainer than the rest; to many perhaps even superfluous, as being a mere numbering of names. After this, another point again is worth inquiry: why he has omitted three kings.
For if, because they were exceedingly ungodly, he therefore passed by their names in silence, neither should he have mentioned the others, who were like them. And this again is another question: why, after having spoken of fourteen generations, has he not in the third division maintained the number? And why Luke has made mention of other names, and not only not all of them the same, but also many more of them, while Matthew has both fewer and different, though he too has ended with Joseph, with whom Luke likewise concluded. You see how much wakeful attention is needed on our part, not only for explanation, but even that we may learn what things we have to explain. For this is no small matter, to be able to find out the difficulties; there being also this other hard point, how Elizabeth, who was of the Levitical tribe, was kinswoman to Mary.
15 But that we may not overload your memory by stringing many things together, let us pause our discourse here for a time. For it is enough for you to be thoroughly roused if you learn the questions only. But if you long for their solution also, this again depends on yourselves before we speak. For if I see you thoroughly awakened and longing to learn, I will endeavour to add the solution also; but if you are gaping and not attending, I will conceal both the difficulties and their solution in obedience to a divine law.
For He says, “Give not the holy things to the dogs, neither cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet.”21 But who is he that tramples them under foot? He who does not account these things precious and venerable. And who, it may be asked, is so wretched as not to esteem these things venerable and more precious than all? He who does not bestow on them so much leisure as on the harlot women in the theatres of Satan.
For there the multitude pass the whole day and give up not a few of their domestic concerns for the sake of this unseasonable employment, and they retain with exactness whatever they have heard, and this though it be to the injury of their souls that they keep it. But here, where God is speaking, they will not bear to tarry even a little time. Therefore, let me warn you: we have nothing in common with Heaven, but our citizenship goes no further than words.
And yet because of this, God has threatened even hell, not in order to cast us into it, but that He might persuade us to flee this grievous tyranny. But we do the opposite and run each day the way that leads there, and while God is commanding us not only to hear but also to do what He says, we do not submit even so much as to listen. When then, I pray you, are we to do what is commanded and to put our hand to the works, if we do not endure so much as to hear the words that relate to them, but are impatient and restless about the time we stay here, although it is exceedingly short?
16 And besides, when we are talking of indifferent matters, if we see those who are in company do not pay attention, we call what they do an insult; but do we consider that we are provoking God if, while He is discoursing on such things as these, we despise what is said and look another way?
Indeed, he who has grown old and travelled over much country reports to us with all exactness the number of stadia22, and the locations of cities, their plans, and their harbours and markets; but we ourselves do not even know how far we are from the city that is in Heaven. For surely we should have endeavoured to shorten the distance, had we known the distance.
That city is not only as far from us as Heaven is from the earth, but even much farther if we are negligent; just as, on the other hand, if we do our best, even in one instant we shall come to its gates. For not by local space but by moral disposition are these distances defined. But you know exactly the affairs of the world, both new and old, and such too as are quite ancient; you can number the princes under whom you have served in time past, the ruler of the games, those who gained the prize, and the leaders of armies—matters that are of no concern to you; but who became ruler in this city—the first, the second, or the third—and for how long each of them, and what each has accomplished and brought to pass, you have not imagined even as in a dream.
And the laws set in this city you will not endure to hear, nor attend to them, even when others tell you of them. How then, I pray you, do you expect to obtain the blessings that are promised when you do not even attend to what is said?
17 But though never before, now at any rate, let us do this. Indeed, for we are on the point of entering into a city (if God permits) of gold, and more precious than any gold. Let us then mark her foundations, her gates consisting of sapphires and pearls; for indeed we have in Matthew an excellent guide.
For through his gate we shall now enter in, and much diligence is required on our part. For should He see anyone not attentive, He casts him out of the city. Indeed, for the city is most kingly and glorious; not as the cities with us, divided into a marketplace, and the royal courts; for there all is the court of the King.
Let us open therefore the gates of our mind, let us open our ears, and with great trembling, when on the point of setting foot on the threshold, let us worship the King who is within. For indeed the first approach has power immediately to confound the beholder. For the present we find the gates closed; but when we see them thrown open (for this is the solution of the difficulties), then we shall perceive the greatness of the splendour within.
For there also, leading you with the eyes of the Spirit, is one who offers to show you all, even this Publican; where the King sits, and who of His host stand by Him; where are the angels, where the archangels; and what place is set apart for the new citizens in this city, and what kind of way it is that leads there, and what manner of portion they have received, who first were citizens in it, and those next after them, and such as followed these.
And how many are the orders of these tribes, how many those of the senate, how many the distinctions of dignity. Let us not therefore with noise or tumult enter in, but with a mystical silence. For if in a theatre, when a great silence has been made, then the letters of the king are read, much more in this city must all be calm and stand with soul and ear erect. For it is not the letters of any earthly master, but of the Lord of angels, which are on the point of being read.
If we would order ourselves in this way, the grace itself of the Spirit will lead us in great perfection, and we shall arrive at the very royal throne, and attain to all the good things, by the grace and love towards man of our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom be glory and might, together with the Father and the Holy Spirit, now and always, even forever and ever.
Amen.
All annotations and references13 notes · 12 references
1 - Scripture Reference
2 - Scripture Reference
3 - Scripture Reference
4 - Editorial Note
The original text reads “who had risen above mere corporeal imaginations,” with a footnote containing the Greek “τν τν σωμτων ννοιανεαγγλιον.” The editor has modernised “corporeal imaginations” to “bodily conceptions,” as the phrase appears to refer to conceptions framed in bodily or material terms rather than to “imaginations” in the modern sense.
5 - Editorial Note
The digital transcription used as the base text for this edition omits the latter portion of section 3 and the beginning of section 4, joining “corporeal imaginations” directly to “Yea, for it was removal of punishment.” The omitted text has been restored from the scanned NPNF First Series, Volume 10 edition.
6 - Scripture Reference
7 - Historical Note
Alluding to the blasphemy of the Macedonians, so often referred to by St. Chrysostom.
8 - Scripture Reference
9 - Scripture Reference
The original text mentions “A reminiscence of 1 Corinthians 1:30.”
10 - Scripture Reference
11 - Note
See St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book III, 11.1: “John, the disciple of the Lord, purposing by the publication of a Gospel to take away the error which Cerinthus had sown among men, and long before him those who are called Nicolaitans… thus began the instruction of his Gospel: In the beginning, &c.” See also St. Clement of Alexandria, as quoted in Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, Book VI, 14; and St. Jerome, Preface to the Commentary on Matthew.
11 - Note
See Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 3.24; St. Jerome, On Illustrious Men 3; Origen, Commentary on Matthew 3.440; and St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.1. St. Chrysostom, however, appears to be quoting another writer besides these authorities.
12 - Note
Or perhaps in Rome, before the death of St. Peter, who approved the Gospel. So St. Clement of Alexandria, as cited in Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 2.15; and St. Jerome, On Illustrious Men 8. St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.1, seems rather to agree with St. Chrysostom. The accounts may perhaps be reconciled by supposing that St. Mark’s Gospel was written in Rome and approved by St. Peter, but was not published until after Peter’s death, when St. Mark was in Egypt. See Massuet’s note on this passage in St. Irenaeus, and Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 2.16.
13 - Historical Note
The Arians, for example, and kindred sects received all the Scriptures. The Marcionites, besides rejecting the Old Testament, received only the Gospel of St. Luke and ten of St. Paul’s epistles, from which Tertullian refutes them at length. The Manichaeans rejected the Old Testament and the Acts of the Apostles; in the latter, the Montanists agreed with them. In addition, they all alleged numerous interpolations in the books which they did receive. See also St. Augustine, Letter 237.
14 - Scripture Reference
15 - Historical Note
A palaestra was an ancient Greek athletic training ground, especially associated with wrestling and other physical exercises. Athletes commonly trained and competed naked, which helps explain Chrysostom's reference here.
16 - Scripture Reference
17 - Editorial Note
The NPNF text reads: “Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them; for this is the Law and the Prophets.” This edition uses the RSV-2CE wording of Matthew 7:12: “So whatever you wish that men would do to you, do so to them; for this is the law and the prophets.”
17 - Scripture Reference
18 - Note
The Greek word philosophia (φιλοσοφία) appears twice in this passage, rendered by the NPNF translators first as “true wisdom” and later as “true love of wisdom.” In Chrysostom and other early Christian writers, philosophia can refer not merely to intellectual philosophy, but more broadly to the pursuit and practice of Christian virtue and a disciplined way of life. The repeated Greek term therefore creates a connection between the “true wisdom” flourishing in this heavenly commonwealth and the “true love of wisdom” later associated with its spiritual armour.
19 - Note
The NPNF editors repeatedly note the Greek word politeia throughout this passage, although the translation renders it as both “commonwealth” and “republic.” The term has a broad civic sense, relating to citizenship, government, or a commonwealth, and can also refer to one's conduct or way of life. Chrysostom's repeated use of the same Greek word strengthens the extended civic image running through the passage: Heaven is the place of this politeia, God is its lawgiver and captain, the apostles are its guides, its members receive rewards, and Christ has established its laws.
20 - Scripture Reference
21 - Editorial Note
The NPNF editors note that Chrysostom's citation is not verbally exact. This edition therefore modernises the wording of the quotation rather than replacing it with the RSV-2CE text.
21 - Scripture Reference
22 - Historical Note
A stadion was an ancient Greek measure of distance, with the plural stadia. Its precise length varied by place and period, but it was approximately 185 metres (about 600 feet). Chrysostom's point here is not the particular measurement, but the traveller's ability to recount distances and locations accurately while Christians may remain unaware of their own spiritual distance from the heavenly city.
Text Used
Homilies on the Gospel of St. Matthew
Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, Volume 10, 1888